How is the European Parliament Elected?

Author:
Michela Palese, former Research and Policy Officer

Posted on the 21st May 2019

Voters across the EU will be heading to the polls this week to elect the 751 representatives to the European Parliament (known as MEPs). Elections will be held in the UK on the 23rd of May with the rest of Europe voting between 23–26 May, with results expected once the last polls close on Sunday evening.

Elections to the European Parliament take place every five years. More than 400 million citizens are eligible to vote making these elections one of the biggest democratic exercises in the world.

While the elections must be based on proportional representation, each member state gets to decide the details of the electoral system used to elect their group of MEPs (Table 1).

Each country can also decide the exact election day within a four-day span from Thursday to Sunday. The voting age, whether citizens can vote by post or in their host country may also vary.

Table 1: Summary of Voting Systems Used in EU Countries

Member StateNumber of MEPsVoting SystemVoting DayElectoral Threshold
Austria18Open listSunday4%
Belgium*21Open listSunday5%
Bulgaria17Open listSundayNone
Croatia11Open listSunday5%
Cyprus6Open listSunday1.8%
Czech Republic21Open listSaturday & Sunday5%
Denmark13Open listSundayNone
Estonia6Open listSundayNone
Finland13Open listSundayNone
France74Closed listSunday5%
Germany96Closed listSundayNone
Greece21Open listSunday3%
Hungary21Closed listSunday5%
Ireland11STVFridayNone
Italy73Open listSunday4%
Latvia8Open listSaturday5%
Lithuania11Open listSunday5%
Luxembourg6Open listSundayNone
Malta6STVSaturdayNone
Netherlands26Open listThursdayNone
Poland51Open listSunday5%
Portugal21Closed listSundayNone
Romania32Closed listSunday5%
Slovakia13Open listSaturday5%
Slovenia8Open listSundayNone
Spain54Closed listSundayNone
Sweden20Open listSunday4%
United Kingdom73Closed list in Great Britain; STV in Northern IrelandThursdayNone

Belgian MEPs are elected using the D’Hondt method, but the electoral college of the German-speaking community de facto uses First Past the Post as it elects only one MEP.

Source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2018/623556/EPRS_ATA(2018)623556_EN.pdf

Open and closed lists

While there is a lot of variation in the finer detail between each member state, the vast majority of European Parliamentary elections can be grouped together as Party List systems. In Party List systems, constituencies are bigger than under First Past the Post and voters elect a group of MEPs. These constituencies could be the whole country or a region or city. In this system, voters get MEPs roughly in proportion to how many people voted for each party. Some countries decided to use thresholds to stop parties with very low support getting a seat (Table 1), others limit the size of their constituencies to create an effective threshold.

Seven EU member states – including Great Britain – decided to elect their MEPs with a ‘closed’ list system. On the ballot paper, voters are presented with a list of parties. Voters vote for a party and each party decides who their candidates are and the order in which they will be elected. If a party wins enough votes for 2 candidates to be elected, the top two on the list get the seats.

19 EU countries decided to adopt more democratic ‘open’ lists systems. In these systems parties still get seats in proportion to the number of votes they receive, but voters get to vote for the individual candidates.

The UK used First Past the Post to elect its MEPs until 1999 when Westminster passed the European Parliamentary Elections Act 1999 to change the system. The UK now uses closed Party Lists to elect 70 MEPs from the 11 regions and nations of Great Britain (Table 2), while Northern Ireland uses the Single Transferable Vote (STV) to elect its three MEPs.

Table 2: GB Constituencies and Number of MEPs

ConstituencyMEPs to be elected
East Midlands5
East of England7
London8
North East England3
North West England8
South East England10
South West England6
West Midlands7
Yorkshire and the Humber6
Scotland6
Wales4
TOTAL70

 

The more MEPs a region elects the lower the level of support needed to get an MEP. It is, therefore, harder for small parties to win seats in the North East than in the South East. Party Lists deliver a more proportional result and allow for the diversity of public opinion to be better represented. But unlike STV – which gives voters a genuine choice on who to vote for – or even an open list system, the UK’s closed Party List system takes power out of the hands of voters at large by preventing them choosing or rejecting individual candidates.

Single Transferable Vote (STV)

Ireland, Malta and Northern Ireland use the Single Transferable Vote to elect their MEPs. As with Party Lists, voters elect a small group of representatives in bigger areas, like a small city or county.

Each elector has one vote. Voters number candidates in order of preference, with a number one for their favourite – they can rank all candidates or just vote for their preferred candidate.

To get elected, a candidate needs to reach a set amount of votes based on the number of seats to be filled and the number of votes cast. If your favourite candidate already has enough votes to win or stands no chance of winning, your vote is transferred to your next choice based on how you ranked candidates. This means you can vote as you please, without worrying about wasting or splitting the vote.

STV puts power in the hands of the public – voters can choose between candidates from the same or different parties, or for independent candidates.

The way we elect our MEPs in the UK is now much better than the system in place before 1999. But the closed list system is still far from perfect and limits voter choice. As we recommended in our 2014 report Close the Gap, the British government always had the power to change the voting system of the whole of the UK to STV, creating a deeper connection between voters and their individual MEPs.

Enjoy this blog? Sign up for more from the Electoral Reform Society

  • If you already receive emails from us, you don't need to complete this form
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Read more posts...

MPs suggest National Commission on Electoral Reform

In our increasingly fragmented and volatile political environment, the case for electoral reform becomes clearer every day. And as the political landscape changes, so too will the route to our objective of a fairly elected...

Posted 11 Sep 2025

National Commission on Electoral Reform terms of reference