North Korean elections: The veneer of democracy

Author:
Chris Terry, Former Research Officer

Posted on the 10th March 2014

This weekend the North Korean ‘election’ took place.

Of course, it wasn’t exactly democratic; it wasn’t really even an election. Each seat had only one candidate, and voters had the choice of voting either for them or against them. There is no secret ballot, votes are carried out in the full view of the authorities and those voting ‘against’ even have to place their ballots in a separate box. Voting ‘against’ is a dangerous act of treason, as is abstaining.

And yet the North Korean government takes the elections very seriously. The country’s relatively new leader, Kim Jong-Un, stood for ‘election’ for the first time this year. He won 100% of the vote on 100% turnout. The North Korean news agency KCNA stated: “This is an expression of… people’s absolute support and profound trust in supreme leader Kim Jong-Un as they single-mindedly remain loyal to him, holding him in high esteem.”

Such a statement is an important reminder of the power of democracy as an idea. Even in the most oppressive dictatorship in the world, the regime still attempts to establish a veneer of democracy in an effort to appear legitimate. They may not be fooling anyone, but the fact they are even trying is testament to democracy’s enduring appeal.

Read more posts...

What’s wrong with First Past the Post?

First Past the Post (FPTP) is the name for the voting system used to elect Members of Parliament (MPs) to Westminster. It’s also used in a variety of other elections across the UK, including local...

Posted 07 May 2025

In a representative democracy, we ought to have a Parliament that matches the way people voted

New research on the chilling effect of voter ID published

New research published last month by Dr Tom Barton at Kings College London shows the potential detrimental effect of new voter ID laws on turnout. The research shows that the Voter ID requirement deterred and...

Posted 07 May 2025

research shows that the Voter ID requirement deterred and effectively disenfranchised an estimated 10,571 potential voters