‘The government should not be able to instruct the people trying to referee its re-election’
The Electoral Commission itself was highly critical of the change, noting that allowing government to guide its work, “is inconsistent with the role that an independent electoral commission plays in a healthy democracy”. Last year, Vijay Rangarajan, chief executive of the Electoral Commission, put a finer point on it, saying: “The point of principle is a government depends on an election to get re-elected. And it shouldn’t be able to instruct the people who are trying to referee that re-election.”
The ERS vehemently opposed the move when it was introduced and has campaigned against it ever since, arguing, along with colleagues in the democracy sector, that it is ‘critical’ that independence is restored. This is especially important against a backdrop where trust in our politics has slumped to record lows, as the British Social Attitudes Survey has found. So, credit must go to ministers for taking this important step in moving to restore the Electoral Commission’s independence. It is a big move in the right direction when it comes to rebuilding trust in politics, as it will help protect public confidence in the body refereeing our elections.
This is also a victory for anyone who cares about the health of our democracy. It shows the power of consistent campaigning, which has been enabled and supported by our members, and that change is possible when it comes to reforming and reinforcing our democratic and political institutions.
Support the Electoral Reform Society
Democratic reform isn’t always a one-way street. But the Electoral Reform Society is here for the long term thanks to the support of our members.
You can help to strengthen this work. If you join the Society as a member, your contributions will support our work in parliament like this, as well as in the press and online – making the case, and backing it up – for how we can fix Westminster’s broken system.
Join the Electoral Reform Society